Economics manfesto

My opinion on Taxes and Governmental rolesL I wasn't sure if he thought this was suppost to be our actual opinion, or just a well developed opinion that I could make up. So I'm doing my actual opinion, rather than fuck with the teacher by telling him that the government should own everything and everyone. This paragraph doesn't count.

I honestly believe the role of the government should change, as the need arises. As a citizen of Great Britain, I am far more familiar with their government style than that of the United States. However, from what I can tell, the only major differences between that of a Republic and a Constitutional monarchy, is the monarch himself. The Government should have a very low grip on the private sector during times of great prosperity, serving mostly as law-enforcement, the Prime minister/President leads the House of Commons/Senate, and they come together and collaborate on laws and whatnot. and during times of depression, great war, famine, or what you will, The Houses of Parliament/Congress may decide to give a Government official almost absolute power for a brief amount of time, so that he may make decisions that would normally cause a fuss. one problem I have with American politicians, is that they are constantly obsessed with keeping their noses clean, campaigning a entire year before the election, and never doing anything to make them unpopular. which you must make unpopular decisions in politics. that's why I favor a monarch, they are less concerned with public opinion, and more concerned with their own country. When absolute power has been granted the King (normally an almost purely ceremonial task.) would have the power to change some or most policies in the government, so long as it is within the parameters of the power that they were granted. ( maybe house of lords gave them power to the laws and taxes, but not the army.) I believe that Government should keep at all times out of religious affairs, not one of my favorites about the UK. however, the US is certain that Atheism is "religiously  neutral' which it is not debatable, it's the lack of religion. which is not neutral. anything that is controversial religiously, shouldn't be instructed in school. (i.e. creationism/evolution)

now, after my attempt to make you believe that this country is a lead balloon, I'll move on to taxes.
I believe in progressive taxes, based on the argument that those who can pay more, should...
wait, fuck. this is deficit spending, not taxes. fuck that. IT'S TOO LATE TO BE TYPING!!!!
At any rate, deficit spending... i believe that it should be allowed, but governments shouldn't buy everyone a rolls royce. some deficit spending is okay, it can be good for the economy, but if you spend like a sixteen year old lass with a new credit card then we're in some deep shit. so that's defiantly not cricket. not sure what else to add. did I make three paragraphs? eh~ I think that big one counts as two. whatever, I'm going to bed. hope you enjoyed my rant.